By Muhammad Murad
There are certain ethical codes regarding the publishing rules of journalism. The basic rules are minimizing harm to readers and the responsibility of journalists to publish the truth and accurate information. The problem under consideration is, “Should a story be published without verification even if it will negatively impact the general public?” The answer is simply ‘No’.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5209c/5209cd6a6c2c3e72bc26b9586c21c32b7e9575b9" alt=""
Firstly, the information was not verified. Secondly,
even if it was verified, there should have been ‘reservations’ about running it
because ‘the potential to inflame is greater than the value of the piece
itself’.
In cases where the information is necessary to be
brought in public’s view but the story cannot be kept under cover until it is
completely verified, it becomes necessary for the organization to carefully
consider how the information needs to be included.
In a nutshell, a balance needs to be sorted to
report the truth with minimizing the potential harm. It also depends on the
importance of the story to the readers. Accuracy should be ensured and no ambiguous
information need be presented. Manipulation in any case is unethical.
Recommendations:
- Journalists should indentify and verify the information or should mention that the report is unverified.
- Readers should be warned against the potential risks of reading the information to themselves and their families.
- Realization of the importance of reporting the story accurately
- There are times when the public’s need to know becomes more important than holding a story until it can be completely verified. In these cases the news organization should carefully consider how they include the information.
- If the story warns readers of something potentially harmful to their health or that which affects their rights or lives in a major way, then the story should be published.
No comments:
Post a Comment